Getting The Facts STRAIGHT
About Banning "Assault Weapons"
Written by "The_Macallan" of AR15.com, 12/06/06
FACT: "Assault Weapons" are RARELY ever used in crimes -
Top 10 Most Frequently Traced Guns Used In Crimes In 1994 (BEFORE the Federal "Assault Weapon" Ban):
1) Lorcin P25 (pistol)
2) Davis Ind. P380 (pistol)
3) Raven Arms MP25 (pistol)
4) Lorcin L25 (pistol)
5) Mossberg 500 (shotgun)
6) Phoenix Arms Raven (pistol)
7) Jennings J22 (pistol)
8) Ruger P89 (pistol)
9) Glock 17 (pistol)
10) Bryco 38 (pistol)
Source: US Dept. Justice.
FACT: "Assault Weapons" are RARELY ever used to kill police officers -
Calibers Most Often Used To Kill Police Officers In 1994 (BEFORE the Federal "Assault Weapon" Ban):
1) .38 caliber handgun - 25.2%
2) .357 magnum handgun - 12.1%
3) 9mm handgun - 9.5%
5) 12 gauge shotgun - 7.4%
6) .22 caliber handgun - 5.4%
7) .22 caliber rifle - 4.4%
Source: US Dept. Justice.
According to the most recent detailed report, Dept. of Justice; Firearm Use by Offender...
FACT: "Assault weapons" are RARELY possessed by criminals during commission of a crime -
State and Federal prison inmates armed during the crime for which they are being incarcerated: (table 2)
* 9.9% of state and 7.3% of federal inmates possessed "single-shot" firearms.
* 7.9% of state and 7.7% of federal inmates possessed conventional semiautomatic firearm.
* 1.5% of state and 1.7% of federal inmates possessed military-style semi-auto or full-auto firearms.
FACT: "Assault weapons" are RARELY involved in ANY crimes -
State and Federal prison inmates who have ever possessed firearms during ANY crime: (table 2)
* 14.2% of state and 10.6% of federal inmates possessed "single-shot" firearm during ANY crime.
* 10.9% of state and 9.8% of federal inmates possessed conventional semiautomatic firearm during ANY crime.
* 2.5% of state and 2.3% of federal inmates possessed military-style semi-auto or full-auto firearms during ANY crime.
FACT: "Assault weapons" possessed by criminals during crimes are usually obtained ILLEGALLY -
Of State prison inmates who possessed military-style semi-auto or full-auto firearms in crimes for which they are incarcerated: (table 10)
* 48.5% obtained them through illegal sources (theft, drug dealer, black market, etc.)
* 25.2% obtained them from family or friend.
* 19.3% obtained them from retail sale.
* 1.9% obtained them from gun shows. (so much for that supposed gun-show "loophole" being a major source of "assault weapons" used in crime)
FACT:
"Assault weapons" that are possessed during a crime are the LEAST
LIKELY type of firearm to be actually discharged during the crime.
FACT: "Assault weapons" that are possessed during a crime are the LEAST LIKELY type of firearm to be used to injure the victim.
FACT:"Assault weapons" that are possessed during a crime are the LEAST LIKELY type of firearm to be used to kill the victim.
"ASSAULT WEAPONS" HAVE NEVER BEEN A SIGNIFICANT FACTOR IN GUN-CRIMES.
FACT: Studies demonstrated that the "Assault Weapon" ban "FAILED" to reduce gun-murders:
"We
were unable to detect any reduction to date in two types of gun murders
that are thought to be closely associated with assault weapons, those
with multiple victims in a single incident and those producing multiple
bullet wounds per victim. We did find a reduction in killings of police
officers since mid-1995. However, the available data are partial and
preliminary, and the trends may have been influenced by law enforcement
agency policies regarding bullet-proof vests."
5.2.3. Assault Weapons and Crime -
"...assault weapons do not appear to be used disproportionately in violent crime relative to other guns"
"Overall,
assault weapons accounted for about 1% of guns associated with
homicides, aggravated assaults, and robberies" and "only 2% of guns
associated with drug crimes were assault weapons."
5.2.4. Unbanned Handguns Capable of Accepting Large-capacity Magazines -
"The ban on large-capacity magazines does not seem to have discouraged the use of these guns."
6.2.1. Trends in Multiple-Victim Gun Homicides -
"[Studies] failed to produce any evidence that the ban reduced the number of victims per gun homicide incident."
6.3.4. Conclusions -
"[Studies]
failed to produce evidence of a post-ban reduction in the average
number of gunshot wounds per case or in the proportion of cases
involving multiple wounds."
6.4.2. Assault Weapons and Homicides of Police Officers -
"In sum, police officers are rarely murdered with assault weapons."
THE DEFINITIVE CONGRESSIONAL REPORT (link here) ON THE "ASSAULT WEAPON" BAN SHOWED IT "FAILED" TO REDUCE GUN-MURDERS.
FACT: "Assault weapons" are NOT "machine guns".
They
are "semi-automatic" firearms meaning one pull of the trigger equals
one bullet discharged while the next bullet is then chambered ready for
the next trigger pull. "Assault weapons" are not full-auto firearms.
They do NOT "spray" bullets with a single pull of the trigger. And they
do not shoot bullets that are "higher power" or "more lethal" than any
ordinary deer-hunter's rifle does.
"ASSAULT WEAPONS" ARE NOT MACHINE-GUNS.
FACT: The "Assault weapon" Ban had NOTHING to do with silencers.
One
of the cosmetic features addressed by the "Assault Weapon" Ban included
flash-suppressors which reduce the bright muzzle-glare ONLY in the eyes
of the shooter in low-light conditions. Flash-suppressors do
NOT "hide" the bright flash from any other observer and do NOT
"silence" the very loud report of the gunshot sound.
"FLASH-SUPPRESSORS" ARE NOT "SILENCERS" AND DO NOT MAKE THE SHOOTER "INVISIBLE" AT NIGHT.
FACT: The Columbine-Killers did not violate any provision of "Assault Weapon" ban.
The firearms used in Columbine included two sawed-off shotguns (already illegal), a pistol and a legally-produced TEC-9 "assault weapon". The "assault weapon" ban did not stop those two UNDERAGE killers from illegally acquiring the guns, illegally modifying the shotguns, illegally bringing them to school or illegally murdering 13 people.
THE "ASSAULT WEAPON" BAN DID NOT TAKE GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS OF CRIMINALS.
FACT: The Federal "Assault Weapon" Ban did NOT actually ban "assault weapons".
The
ban only prohibited the NEW PRODUCTION of certain firearms based on
cosmetic features. There were hundreds of thousands of "assault
weapons" legally owned, bought and sold BEFORE the ban was implemented
and there were STILL hundreds of thousands of "assault weapons" being legally, peacefully and safely owned, bought and sold during the 10 years of the ban's existance.
EXISTING
"UZIs, AR-15s AND AK-47s" WERE COMPLETELY LEGAL TO OWN, BUY AND SELL
FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE FEDERAL "ASSAULT WEAPON BAN".
FACT: The 2nd Amendment is NOT about "duck hunting".
Military-style
firearms (like "assault weapons") are specifically protected by the 2nd
Amendment according to the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in U.S. v. Miller (1939) and Lewis v. U.S. (1980).
* In the Miller decision the Supreme Court stated, "In
the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession of [a
particular gun] has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or
efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second
Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument".
* In the Lewis decision, the Supreme Court stated, "the
Second Amendment guarantees no right to keep and bear a firearm that
does not have 'some reasonable relationship to the preservation or
efficiency of a well-regulated militia'".
SO ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT, POSSESSION OF MILITARY-STYLE FIREARMS ARE EXACTLY THE TYPE OF FIREARMS THAT ARE PROTECTED BY THE 2ND AMENDMENT.
FACT: Nobody NEEDS to infringe on the 2nd Amendment in order to reduce crime.
Our RIGHTS do not ebb and flow or come and go with the annual crime reports.
Our RIGHTS do not depend upon what today's gangbangers or psychopaths decide to do to get their next thrill or rage out.
Our RIGHTS are not contingent upon, qualified by nor based on what CRIMINALS use to commit crimes!
Our
RIGHTS are derived from natural law, specifically protected by the
Constitution and are NOT dependant on the findings in any crime
studies!!!
Banning the possession of "assault weapons" because of
some crime statistics is like banning the possession of sports cars
because of drunk driving deaths or like banning the possession of the
boxcutters because of 9-11.
OUR RIGHTS ARE NOT DERIVED FROM
NOR DETERMINED BY THE MOST RECENT CRIME STATISTICS!